Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Jurassic Park 2016 - Dilophosaurus (feathered) by Tomozaurus Jurassic Park 2016 - Dilophosaurus (feathered) by Tomozaurus
Dilophosaurus weatherilli
Wacom Tablet + Adobe Photoshop Elements 5
2016

Jurassic Park 2016 is a series of images depicting the extinct animals from Jurassic Park (1993) as we know them to look today.

Scaly version: tomozaurus.deviantart.com/art/…
Add a Comment:
 
:icongrisador:
grisador Featured By Owner Feb 20, 2016
This is perfect
Reply
:iconmegalotitan:
Megalotitan Featured By Owner Feb 18, 2016  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Do you have any idea why JP added frills to their Dilophosaurus?
Reply
:icontomozaurus:
Tomozaurus Featured By Owner Feb 18, 2016  Student General Artist
Yes, both the frill and the size change were done specifically to distinguish it from the Velociraptor for the audience.
Reply
:iconmegalotitan:
Megalotitan Featured By Owner Feb 18, 2016  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Although I think the crest would still distinguish it from Velociraptor.
Reply
:icontomozaurus:
Tomozaurus Featured By Owner Feb 18, 2016  Student General Artist
Considering I have met people who still confused it for a Velociraptor I think Spielberg may have made the right call.
Reply
:iconmegalotitan:
Megalotitan Featured By Owner Feb 18, 2016  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
That's hilarious! XD
Reply
:iconmegalotitan:
Megalotitan Featured By Owner Feb 18, 2016  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Ah, okay.
Reply
:iconorange-eyed-serpent:
orange-eyed-serpent Featured By Owner Jan 26, 2016  Hobbyist General Artist
Wow, looks fantastic. I like the keratinous look to the face.
Reply
:icondinogirl121:
DinoGirl121 Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2016
They both look good! I can't decide on which one I like more Doh!
Reply
:icontomozaurus:
Tomozaurus Featured By Owner Jan 26, 2016  Student General Artist
Me either to be honest. As soon as we find out if it had scales or feathers in life, that one will be the favorite haha
Reply
:icont-pekc:
T-PEKC Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2016
Both of your versions look superb, but due to some subjective reasons this one is the one I prefer. :P
Reply
:icongardow:
Gardow Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Are you sticking to the animals from the movie, or expanding with the book?
Reply
:icontomozaurus:
Tomozaurus Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2016  Student General Artist
Movie only.
Reply
:icongojira5000:
Gojira5000 Featured By Owner Edited Jan 25, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Are you going with only what animals actually appeared in the flesh during the movie, though? Because I remember a couple of animals (StegosaurusMetriacanthosaurus, Baryonyx, Herrerasaurus, Proceratosaurus, Segisaurus) that were seen to have existed in the original film, but were never on-screen. Would those count as being in the movie or not?
Reply
:icontomozaurus:
Tomozaurus Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2016  Student General Artist
No, they do not count as being in the movie. What is the point of illustrating an "updated" version of a design that never got an original design? None.
Reply
:icongojira5000:
Gojira5000 Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
To be fair, we already know what Stegosaurus would look like; they appeared in The Lost World: Jurassic Park, after all, and I really doubt they'd be too different from those that would have been on Nublar.

I know Herrerasaurus definitely appeared in the TellTale game, which is (at least, IIRC) supposed to be concurrent to the first movie and is canon to the series. Baryonyx has also been given designs through the merchandising, as well. The others, I'll admit aren't really feasible. But those three I think would slide by on technicality, because we know what they probably would have looked like in the tour.
Reply
:icontomozaurus:
Tomozaurus Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2016  Student General Artist
I subscribe thoroughly to the John Conway school of everything that is not in the films themselves is very not canon. "Extended universes" are basement-dweller fanwank garbage.
Reply
:iconpcawesomeness:
PCAwesomeness Featured By Owner Jan 24, 2016
Ooooh.
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
January 24, 2016
Image Size
148 KB
Resolution
867×336
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
1,915
Favourites
89 (who?)
Comments
18
Downloads
19

License

Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
×